<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dakota Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dakotapoll.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dakotapoll.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:04:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dec. 2012 Cross Tabs SD Legislature</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/dec-2012-cross-tabs-sd-legislature</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/dec-2012-cross-tabs-sd-legislature#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross Tabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislature_SouthDakotaXTabs3-1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Legislature_SouthDakotaXTabs3-1.pdf">Legislature_SouthDakotaXTabs3-1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/dec-2012-cross-tabs-sd-legislature/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dec. 2012 Toplines</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/dec-2012-toplines</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/dec-2012-toplines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dakota Poll Dec 2012 Toplines]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Dakota-Poll-Dec-2012-Toplines.pdf">Dakota Poll Dec 2012 Toplines</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/dec-2012-toplines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low Marks for Legislature in New Dakota Poll</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/low-marks-for-legislature-in-new-dakota-poll</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/low-marks-for-legislature-in-new-dakota-poll#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[December 2012 Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Results Suggest that Voters Would Support “Nebraska-Style” Non-Partisan Legislature With only days remaining before the 2013 session of the South Dakota Legislature convenes, a new Dakota Poll survey of registered voters regarding public attitudes toward the state Legislature, suggests that a large majority of South Dakotans (60%-32%) believe that “politics in Pierre has become too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Results Suggest that Voters Would Support “Nebraska-Style” Non-Partisan Legislature</h2>
<p>With only days remaining before the 2013 session of the South Dakota Legislature convenes, a new Dakota Poll survey of registered voters regarding public attitudes toward the state Legislature, suggests that a large majority of South Dakotans (60%-32%) believe that “politics in Pierre has become too partisan” and that the Legislature is doing an ineffective job of dealing with the most pressing issues facing the state.</p>
<p>Survey respondents also agreed, by a margin of 56% to 41%, that “the South Dakota legislature is controlled too much by lobbyists and special interests”.</p>
<p>Over the last two decades, both houses of the South Dakota legislature have become heavily dominated by the Republican Party. In 2013, the House of Representatives will include 53 Republicans and only 17 Democrats. In the Senate, the balance is 28 Republicans and 7 Democrats. While GOP state leaders remain widely popular, by an overwhelming majority, 78% to 20%, survey respondents said, “One party government is a bad idea.”</p>
<p>Survey respondents were asked about two policy innovations to make the legislature more non-partisan and more transparent. By a large majority of 62% to 33% those surveyed said they would favor a “non-partisan legislature modeled on the current Nebraska state government, in which individuals would compete in non-partisan primaries without party designations, and the top two vote getters competing against each other in the general election.</p>
<p>By an even larger majority of 82% to 17% survey respondents said they would support a law to establish tougher disclosure law on lobbying income and expenses.</p>
<p>Survey respondents were asked to grade the Legislature on a scale of “excellent, good, fair, and poor” on its handling of fourteen different policy problems facing the state ranging from “providing adequate funding for K-12 public education”, to “spending taxpayer dollars wisely”, to “helping South Dakota get more high wage jobs.” Strong majorities judged the Legislature to be doing a “fair to poor job”, and in no policy area did the number of respondents who believe that the Legislature is doing an “excellent” job rise out of single digits.</p>
<p>In particular, the Legislature continues to be haunted by public dissatisfaction with its effort to properly support public education. Only 8% of respondents said that the Legislature was doing an “excellent” job of “providing adequate funding for K-12 public education,” while 37% said that the legislature was doing a “poor” job. When asked whether the legislature is “Making sure our education system is creating workers attractive to industry”, only 5% of respondents said the Legislature was doing an “excellent” job. 24% said the legislature was doing a “poor” job. Similarly, when asked if the Legislature was doing a good job of “Making sure our educational system is creating workers qualified to compete for high wage jobs”, only 7% gave the Legislature an “excellent” grade, while 23% gave it a “poor” grade.</p>
<p>Respondents were given the open-ended opportunity to say what “the most important issue that leaders in Pierre should be focused on” in 2013. 31% said that they wanted the focus put on education. 16.1% said “Budget”. 15.6% answered “Economy”. Only 4.3% suggested that the Legislature should focus on taxes. By a margin of 65%&#8211;31% respondents agreed with the statement, “The Legislature spends too much time and energy on the abortion issue.”</p>
<p>In policy areas where the state is heavily supported by federal spending (“roads and highways” and “protecting the environment” ), the number of respondents who believe the Legislature is doing an “excellent/good” job approached bare majorities of 48% and 53% respectively. But in policy areas where the state is dependent on its own resources and has only small support from the federal government&#8211;“helping South Dakota get more high-wage jobs”, and “providing the right tools to attract new jobs to South Dakota” &#8212; the public grades the Legislature poorly. 70% of respondents thought the Legislature is doing a “fair to poor” job of “Helping South Dakota get more high-wage jobs”. Only 28% said that the Legislature is doing an “excellent/good” job.</p>
<p>Only 42% of respondents said that the legislature was doing an “excellent/good” job of “Providing the right tools to attract new jobs to South Dakota”, whereas 56% said that the Legislature was doing a “fair /poor” job.</p>
<p>A large number of South Dakotans know at least one member of the legislature, but voter participation in the processes of government is low. Only 3% of respondents say they have made a phone call to a member of the Legislature. 14% have sent a letter. 13% have attended a meeting. But 70% have had no contact with a member of the Legislature at all.</p>
<p>While President Obama has very high “unfavorable” ratings among South Dakota voters, 55% unfavorable compared to 42% favorable, Governor Daugaard receives high marks, with a 66% favorable-25% unfavorable rating. Representative Kristi Noem has more difficulty with voters, scoring only a 56% favorable/40% unfavorable rating. With a “very unfavorable” rating of 24%, Congresswoman Noem continues to feel the effects from Novermber’s tough re-election campaign.</p>
<p>U.S. Senator John Thune continues to be extraordinarily popular with voters. His overall favorable rating is 75%, compared to a 21% unfavorable rating. While Democratic Senator Tim Johnson is also popular, with 60% favorable and 32% unfavorable. Johnson lags far behind his potential 2014 opponent, former Governor Mike Rounds, who scored a strong 72% favorable rating compared to only 23% negative. Rounds’ high favorability rating and low unfavorable rating suggests that Johnson will have his hands full holding on to his seat in 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/low-marks-for-legislature-in-new-dakota-poll/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Dakota Poll Finds Broad Support for Sales Tax Increase to Fund Education and Medicaid. Voters Closely Split on Daugaard Education Plan</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/new-dakota-poll-finds-broad-support-for-sales-tax-increase-to-fund-education-and-medicaid-voters-closely-split-on-daugaard-education-plan</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/new-dakota-poll-finds-broad-support-for-sales-tax-increase-to-fund-education-and-medicaid-voters-closely-split-on-daugaard-education-plan#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 2012 Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By a margin of 67% to 30%, South Dakota voters say they intend to vote “Yes” on Initiated Measure #15 on the November ballot, to according to results of the new Dakota Poll. Measure 15 would raise the South Dakota sales tax one cent with the proceeds used to support public education and Medicaid. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By a margin of 67% to 30%, South Dakota voters say they intend to vote “Yes” on <strong>Initiated Measure #15</strong> on the November ballot, to according to results of the new <em>Dakota Poll</em>. <em>Measure 15 would raise the South Dakota sales tax one cent with the proceeds used to support public education and Medicaid. </em></p>
<p><em>The Dakota Poll</em> was conducted by RBI Strategies and Research of Denver, Colorado between September 29-30. 400 “likely voters” were surveyed by telephone. The margin of error is 4.9%. All questions, topline results, and crosstabs are available at <a href="dakotapoll.com">dakotapoll.com.</a></p>
<p>Support for the sales tax crossed ideological lines. Self-described “Conservatives”, “Liberals” and “Moderates” all supported Measure #15 by large majorities. Even self-identified “Tea Party” supporters said they intended to vote “Yes” by a margin of 49% to 43%. Among “Very Conservative” voters, 49% of respondents said they intended to vote “No”, while 46% said they intended to vote “Yes.” (<a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/SD-Cross-Tabs-12-021-1.pdf">see crosstab table # 104</a>)</p>
<p>Respondents to the <em>Dakota Poll</em> also indicated that they were leaning against <strong>Referred Law #16</strong> on the November ballot by a margin of 52% to 46%. Referred Law #16 grew out of Governor Daugaard’s education reform initiative in the 2012 legislature. If passed <em>the law would establish a system of merit pay for excellent teachers, pay bonuses to math and science teachers, establish a uniform teacher and principal evaluation system, and eliminate the current requirements for teacher tenure.</em></p>
<p>Conservatives narrowly support the Governor’s initiative. Moderates and liberals were opposed. (<a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/SD-Cross-Tabs-12-021-1.pdf">see crosstab table # 114</a>)</p>
<p>The mood of South Dakota voters toward the economy has dramatically improved. In October, 2010, at the height of the financial crisis, the <em>Dakota Poll</em> surveyed “South Dakota Adults” on the question, “Would you say things in South Dakota are heading in the right direction or are they off on the wrong track?” In 2010 less than a majority, 49%, said things were on the right track. 29% said things were on the wrong track. Almost exactly two years later, the <em>Dakota Poll</em> asked “likely voters” the same question. “Heading in the right direction jumped from 49% to 65%. “Wrong direction” held steady at 28%. In 2010 the “unsure category was 21%. Today, the “unsure” category has dropped to only 6%.</p>
<p>Conservatives are most optimistic that “things in South Dakota are heading in the right direction”, by a margin of 71%-22%. Liberals are evenly divided. 45% believe things are headed in the right direction. 45% believe things are on the “wrong track”.</p>
<p>Regarding “Referred Law #14” the <em>Large Project Fund</em> that would allow the Governor to “eliminate the contractor’s excise tax on construction projects that exceed $5 million in cost, on a case by case basis, when the Governor deems it beneficial to give the project a financial incentive”, 34% of the respondents supported the measure while 54% said they intended to vote no or were leaning toward a no vote.</p>
<p>On Constitutional Amendment “O”, which would change the way proceeds from the Cement Plant Trust Fund are allocated to support state aid to schools, respondents were overwhelmingly positive. 63% indicated that they would vote “Yes” to change the Constitutional language. Only 28% said they intended to vote “No”.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/new-dakota-poll-finds-broad-support-for-sales-tax-increase-to-fund-education-and-medicaid-voters-closely-split-on-daugaard-education-plan/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2012-Likely Voters in SD Toplines</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/october-2012-toplines-for-likely-voters-in-sd</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/october-2012-toplines-for-likely-voters-in-sd#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SD Toplines-Initiatives and Referenda 12-021-1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/SD-Toplines-Initiatives-and-Referenda-12-021-1.docx">SD Toplines-Initiatives and Referenda 12-021-1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/october-2012-toplines-for-likely-voters-in-sd/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2012-Likely Voters in SD Crosstabs</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/october-2012-study-of-likely-voters-in-sd</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/october-2012-study-of-likely-voters-in-sd#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross Tabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 2012- Study of SD Likely Voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/SD-Cross-Tabs-12-021-1.pdf">October 2012- Study of SD Likely Voters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/october-2012-study-of-likely-voters-in-sd/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2012-Media Poll Crosstabs</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/april-2012-media-poll-crosstabs</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/april-2012-media-poll-crosstabs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April 2012 Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross Tabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here for crosstabs of the April 2012 Dakota Poll on South Dakota Media Habits and Internet Use http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/12-002-Dakota-Media-Poll-Crosstabs-1.pdf &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click here for crosstabs of the April 2012 Dakota Poll on South Dakota Media Habits and Internet Use</p>
<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/12-002-Dakota-Media-Poll-Crosstabs-1.pdf">http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/12-002-Dakota-Media-Poll-Crosstabs-1.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/april-2012-media-poll-crosstabs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2012 &#8220;Media Use&#8221; Toplines</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/april-2012-media-use-toplines</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/april-2012-media-use-toplines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April 2012 Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here to see our April 2012 Toplines PDF]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/12-002-Media-Dakota-Poll-Toplines-1.pdf" target="_blank">Click here to see our April 2012 Toplines PDF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/april-2012-media-use-toplines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Dakota Poll Finds Increasing Saturation of Internet Use and ‘Smart Phone’ Use in South Dakota: KELO Makes Strong Move into Internet</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/new-dakota-poll-finds-increasing-saturation-of-internet-use-and-smart-phone-use-in-south-dakota-kelo-makes-strong-move-into-internet</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/new-dakota-poll-finds-increasing-saturation-of-internet-use-and-smart-phone-use-in-south-dakota-kelo-makes-strong-move-into-internet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April 2012 Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contact: Sam Hurst-(605) 430-4286 Samhurst50@gmail.com Television remains king, but South Dakotans are actively using the internet and ‘smart phones” as sources of information in their daily lives according the a recent survey by The Dakota Poll, and mainstream traditional media is responding by developing its own online presence. The Poll was conducted in February and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contact: Sam Hurst-(605) 430-4286</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Samhurst50@gmail.com">Samhurst50@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Television remains king, but South Dakotans are actively using the internet and ‘smart phones” as sources of information in their daily lives according the a recent survey by <em>The Dakota Poll, and </em>mainstream traditional media is responding by developing its own online presence. The Poll was<em> </em>conducted in February and March by <em>RBI Strategies and Research</em> of Denver, Colorado. 461 South Dakotans were surveyed. The margin of error was 4.56.</p>
<p>81% of South Dakotans now have access to the internet at their home or work (52% have access at both locations). Access does not decline in rural communities. While the saturation of internet access is 87% in cities, it is a remarkable 78% for people who live in rural areas. 70% of respondents use the internet every day. (<a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Internet-Adoption.aspx">http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Internet-Adoption.aspx</a>) According to an August 2011 survey by the Pew Internet and American Life Project, 78% of Americans use the internet.</p>
<p>44% of the people surveyed use a cell phone capable of accessing the internet—a so-called ‘smart phone’. Despite South Dakota’s rural profile, smart phone usage is almost exactly equal to the percentage of Americans nationwide who use ‘smart phones’.  (<a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012/Findings.aspx">http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012/Findings.aspx</a>) 70% of the people who have a ‘smart phone’ use its internet capabilities at least once a day.</p>
<p>When asked if they would be willing to pay a “small monthly fee to receive local information, local news, and local sports online” an overwhelming 79% said, “no”. Only 3% said they would be willing to pay a fee for news and information.</p>
<p>South Dakotans are also spending money to make purchases on the internet. 71% of respondents said they had made an online purchase of between $50 and $500 in the last two months. 48% said they had “visited the website of a South Dakota business”. 24% said they had made an online purchase from a South Dakota company.</p>
<p>While most mainstream daily media outlets in South Dakota have websites, KELO and its West River affiliate KCLO have made the most substantial inroads with the public. When asked “What is your favorite website for state and local news?” 12% of respondents listed Sioux Falls CBS affiliate KELO. 11% listed KELO’s west river partner KCLO. Both television stations use the website <a href="http://www.keloland.com">www.keloland.com</a>.</p>
<p>By comparison, the <em>Rapid City Journal’s</em> website (<a href="http://rapidcityjournal.com/">http://rapidcityjournal.com/</a>) is the favorite of 8% and the Sioux Falls Argus leader website (<a href="http://www.argusleader.com/">http://www.argusleader.com/</a>) is the favorite of 6%. The website of traditional west river regional powerhouse KOTA, <a href="http://www.kotatv.com">www.kotatv.com</a> is the favorite of only 2%.  (KOTA has recently launched a new web presence, <a href="http://www.mytown.com">www.mytown.com</a>. The site is new and has been heavily advertised, but was not tested in the Dakota Poll.) These outcomes suggest that KELO is extending its traditional broadcast dominance into the internet.</p>
<p>57% of respondents said that they visit Facebook. One third, 33%, said that they use Facebook every day. But when asked the question: “Which one do you have more confidence in—local news as reported by newspapers, TV or radio stations—or what ordinary citizens write on blogs, Facebook, and the like?” 69% said that they have the most confidence in traditional newspapers/TV/Radio. Only 6% said that they had confidence in blogs, Facebook, and the like.”</p>
<p><em>Battle Between Traditional Media</em></p>
<p><em> </em>When asked to describe their “main source of <em>national</em> news”, South Dakotans overwhelmingly chose television—56%. Internet sources are the main source of <em>national</em> news for 25% of respondents. Newspapers are the main source for 13%. Radio 6%.</p>
<p>The numbers change dramatically when the question was changed from “<em>national news</em>” to “<em>local news</em>”. 39% said they rely on newspapers for <em>local </em>news. 36% rely on television. 14% rely on internet.</p>
<p>28% of respondents to the Dakota Poll said that they read the online edition of their regular newspaper or both the online and print edition.</p>
<p>7% said that they had dropped their paid subscription to the printed newspaper in favor of the online edition.</p>
<p>When asked the question: “…if your local newspaper no longer existed, would that have a major impact, a minor impact, or no impact on your ability to keep up with information and news about your local community?” 39% said it would have a <em>major </em>impact. 35% said it would have a <em>minor </em>impact. 25% said it would have <em>no </em>impact.</p>
<p>In a battery of seven questions designed to reveal the “quality” of news coverage in South Dakota, and the credibility of television news compared to newspapers, the results were heavily tilted in favor of local television. For example, when asked to rate “the quality of your local newspaper on reporting the news accurately”: 19% reported “excellent” and 24% answered “only fair or poor”. By comparison, when asked the same question of their “favorite local TV news station”, 24% reported “excellent” and 9% answered “only fair or poor”.</p>
<p>Complete survey results from “The Dakota Poll on South Dakota Media” are available at <em>dakotapoll.com.</em></p>
<p>The Dakota Poll is also available on Facebook</p>
<p>NOTE FROM JODY SEVERSON: When reviewing crosstab tables, remember that the percentages shown in the &#8220;toplines&#8221; may vary from those shown in the crosstab table. In the survey, some people were not asked some of the questions.  For example, people who do not have Internet access were not asked the battery of questions detailing Internet usage.  In the toplines, all percentages are shown as a percentage of the entire sample, all 461 interviews, e.g., all South Dakotans.   In some of the crosstab tables, for each question which was asked only to a subgroup (Internet users, for example), the percentages are shown as a percentage of the group that answered that particular question.</p>
<p>We did it this way to keep the topline numbers consistent and to be sure that people were not misled by overlooking the fact that some people may not have been asked a given question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/new-dakota-poll-finds-increasing-saturation-of-internet-use-and-smart-phone-use-in-south-dakota-kelo-makes-strong-move-into-internet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Education Poll Top Line Results</title>
		<link>http://dakotapoll.com/2011-education-poll-top-line-results</link>
		<comments>http://dakotapoll.com/2011-education-poll-top-line-results#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September 2011 Education Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dakotapoll.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a link to the Top Line results of the Dakota Poll on Education Education Dakota Poll &#8211; Toplines &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a link to the Top Line results of the Dakota Poll on Education</p>
<p><a href="http://dakotapoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Education-Dakota-Poll-Toplines-4.pdf">Education Dakota Poll &#8211; Toplines</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dakotapoll.com/2011-education-poll-top-line-results/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.309 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-02 22:58:03 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->